<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'Gay marriage legalised ?' | sgForums.com</title>
    <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://www.sgforums.com/open_search.xml"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by FireIce @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:16:06 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;cheers~&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
it's about time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:16:06 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8146778</guid>
      <author>FireIce</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by RiG&amp;amp;GO @ Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:13:30 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;incest and homosexuality arent the same.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:13:30 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8146775</guid>
      <author>RiG&amp;GO</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by playboy_1985 @ Fri, 30 May 2008 21:15:49 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;yeah yeah next time they will legalise incest marriage and sex
also.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:15:49 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8126807</guid>
      <author>playboy_1985</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by angel7030 @ Fri, 30 May 2008 14:22:42 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_from"&gt;Originally posted by Poolman:&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="quote_body"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The world has changed !!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No, the world has not changed, it man, man who change and become
gay. So dun blame mother earth ya&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:22:42 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8126010</guid>
      <author>angel7030</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by Poolman @ Fri, 30 May 2008 04:18:40 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The world has changed !!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:18:40 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8125296</guid>
      <author>Poolman</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by Poolman @ Fri, 30 May 2008 04:17:58 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;"California is now only the second
US state after Massachusetts to legalize unions between
homosexuals"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Didn't know until today ......&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:17:58 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8125295</guid>
      <author>Poolman</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gay marriage legalised ? replied by Poolman @ Fri, 30 May 2008 04:14:35 +0800</title>
      <description>&lt;p class=""&gt;SAN FRANCISCO (AFP) - - California will hold its first
gay marriages starting on June 17, state authorities told its
public officials Wednesday, two weeks after the state Supreme Court
quashed a ban on gay marriage in a historic ruling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In the ceremony, the authorities said in a statement, the
terms husband and wife will be replaced by "party A" and "party B."
The union, in all its effects, will in no other way differ from a
normal civilian marriage officiated by state authorities.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an opinion that could have nationwide implications, the
California Supreme Court on May 15 voted 4-3 in favor of plaintiffs
who argued that restricting marriage to men and women was
discriminatory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ruling added that all California couples had a "basic civil
right" to marry "without regard to their sexual orientation."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California is now only the second US state after Massachusetts
to legalize unions between homosexuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Supreme Court rulings go into effect 30 days after publication,
but state authorities set June 17 as the date for the first
marriages to be officiated, since the ruling can be appealed up to
June 16.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ruling on gay marriage followed a long-running legal battle
that erupted in 2000 when California voters approved a law
declaring that only marriages between men and women could be
legally recognized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In February 2004, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom defied state
law by issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, arguing that
existing laws were illegal because they violated equal rights
legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A court later halted the issuance of licenses and declared that
same-sex marriages that took place during this period were void,
but civil rights activists argued that limiting marriage to
opposite-sex couples was unconstitutional.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2005 the San Francisco Superior Court ruled in favor of the
plaintiffs, finding that there was no justification for refusing to
allow marriages.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the decision was overturned in 2006 by the California Court
of Appeal, which ruled in a 2-1 decision that the state's desire to
"carry out the expressed wishes of a majority" was sufficient to
preserve the existing law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California lawmakers have also voted in favor of gay marriage
but the bill was vetoed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who
said, however, he would respect the Supreme Court's decision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A coalition of religious and social conservative groups have
vowed to add a vote calling for a ban on same-sex marriage when
California goes to the polls in November's election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State election officials will rule next month on whether
sponsors of the vote have gathered enough signatures to force the
issue onto the ballot. Schwarzenegger has said he would not support
the measure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday's ruling coincided with a Field opinion survey that
found Californians in favor of gay marriage outnumbering those
against by a 52-41 percent margin, in stark contrast with the 59-28
percent advantage gay marriage opposers had in the first survey the
group took on the issue in 1977.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:14:35 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">www.sgforums.com:2237:319171:8125292</guid>
      <author>Poolman</author>
      <link>http://www.sgforums.com/forums/2237/topics/319171</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
